an exploration of light's manifestations
withdrawing the definition of its current representation.

light is the essence of all life.
do you know what it looks like?

how can the concept of light
plainly observed
allow a judgemental decision to be made about its manifestation
past only recognizing its apparent existence?

do we need to define an existence's character - what it is and what it appears to be - to comprehend its being?

look at an image - why do we need to say: "what is it?"

If the doors of perception were cleansed everything would appear to man as it is: Infinite.
William Blake, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell

does all judgemental naming and decision making keep us close to our pre-set conceptions and therefore make us incapable of purely observant perceptual comprehension?

i gather meaning without definition.